Fergie: the Godfather of Manipulation
Pre-match Press conferences with managers, for the journalist, can range from enlightening to entertaining to exasperating, from hilarious to hackneyed to humdrum. An article has to be written, whatever the banal musings of the football figurehead, and column inches have to be filled. Enlightening, entertaining and hilarious “pressers” are always preferred by the scribe.
Post-match pressers are different. A match that has just finished can be discussed, the controversy digested and the referee slated. All on the spur of the moment – when tempers are raging, emotions boiling and the facts unclear. “Never let the facts get in the way of a good story” is an age-old journo’s maxim which, at times, managers love to indulge in, incessantly.
But forget the cauldron of the post-match PCs. They are often one of a kind, unique, knee-jerk stuff. Yet the pre-match preambles are usually carefully planned, carried out strictly to the order of the club PR department and, ultimately, controlled by the manager. And if that manager is Sir Alex Ferguson, the boss of bosses, be afraid. Be very afraid.
Ferguson is also one of a kind, unique. Mr Man Utd. And woe betide any hapless hack who should ask a question that, though totally relevant, is deemed to be worthless by the Old Trafford legend. Fergie is his name, intimidation is his game. And journo bans from Carrington, the Manchester United training complex, have been plentiful over the years.
Only in August, my colleagues Mark Ogden, of the “Daily Telegraph”, and Paul Hetherington, of the “Daily Star Sunday”, were barred from attending United’s regular Friday pressers because they dared to report that Rio Ferdinand would miss the seasonal opener against Everton due to a groin injury.
That Ogden and Hetherington were spot on – Ferdinand missed the 1-0 defeat at Goodison Park – held no value to Ferguson. As Alan Sugar, another notoriously cantankerous knight of the realm, might have uttered: “You’re fired.” And so the Telegraph and Star Sunday were denied access to Fergie’s Friday briefings … for getting it right!
In my experience, I concur with another fellow journo, who once remarked that the weekly Carrington ordeals are little more than “tense, joyless affairs”. You would have to strike a delicate balance: suck up to the Great Man, with a tender line in interrogation, or run the risk of him walking out … and incurring the wrath of the other scribes who needed to fill a “double-page spread” with his infinite wisdom but were unable to because of his sudden departure. And it was your fault.
And yet, on other isolated encounters with Fergie, I have have found him affable, revealing and at ease with the normally despised Fourth Estate. On United’s pre-season tours, often to the Far East, he will always sit down on one pre-designated day in a five-star hotel suite to chat about anything and everything. And if he has something of importance to get off his chest, he needs no prompting.
It is as though, away from the suffocating confines of the domestic Premier League, he can relax. Well, just a bit. For an invited audience of, say, eight to ten daily newspaper journos – and he would accommodate the Sunday papers and broadcast media separately – he will wax lyrical for an hour or more. And provide excellent copy that could run to a 2,000-word piece, which our desk chiefs would be ecstatic with. The mega-cost of the trip, immediately, will have become worth it.
Beguiling stuff and, when talking to him, it’s almost like chatting with your dad or grandad. Plenty of reminiscing but with an abundance of in-yer-face and up-to-date topics, too. Fergie knows how to “guide” the media, especially of the passive variety. He is the Godfather of Manipulation and clearly gets a kick out of it, even at his veteran age. Fair play to him.
But I do recall a one-on-one meeting with him, at a major championship finals abroad for which he was a television pundit. In the “Green Room”, Fergie wanted the horse racing piped through from back home and, of course, he got his wish. Yes, I like a little flutter, too, and what ensued was a marvellously amicable conversation about the “Sport of Kings”. Even if, privately, I was cacking myself in case I made the wrong comment, however innocent.
This was Fergie Unplugged. Away from the domestic public scrutiny, the goldfish-bowl glare, the seven-year refusal to talk to the BBC, all that bollox. And before he had to go into the TV studio to offer his opinions to the nation – with, if I remember correctly, Terry Venables and others – he generously told me to back his latest prize horse, which was running for the first time shortly. Of course, I forgot. And, of course, it won!
Oh well. You live and learn …
Other managers, also doyens of their profession, do not have such an edge as “hairdryrer” Fergie. Arsene Wenger’s pre-match pressers are usually civilised functions at Arsenal’s London Colney training ground in Hertfordshire, with the Sky Sports “attack dogs” and agency boys given the first airing. And then, if there’s any scraps left over, the daily and Sunday paper guys get a go with the urbane Frenchman on their own. He’s a lovely man, who will answer almost any query, however loaded.
Harry Redknapp, when at Tottenham, always offered a gag a minute at the club’s former Chigwell base in Essex. Sometimes, you just didn’t know whether he was being serious or talking clap-trap. But who cared? It always made for a great yarn. And yet, when his first XI selection was unveiled on the Saturday afterwards, you did wonder: “Er, Harry. Were you not being rather convenient with the truth?”
And the “Special One”? Jose Mourinho. I would not claim to know him but his pressers when the Chelsea manager were always enlightening, entertaining and often hilarious. As I mentioned earlier, just what a journo craves. I cannot recall, either, that he personally banned any reporter from attending, though the Chelsea “Thought Police” at the time – a particularly rabid bunch – might have ruled otherwise.
I also remember that, after he had moved on to Inter Milan, I attended an Internazionale match on a lovely Mediterranean isle, when his side had put in a rather less than impressive Champions League performance. And yet he spoke for more than an hour afterwards, in Portuguese, Spanish, Italian and English, to explain his team’s shortcomings.
Not great for the journo trying to hit their deadline. But let’s face it, if Mourinho is talking, you can’t ignore him and get on with your copy because he just might say something that will “Hold The Back Page”. And if you miss it, there would be hell to pay. But would Fergie have done that on the back of such crap display? No way.
Managers do not control the media, however much they might think they do. A journo will always break ranks, through “contacts”, “leaks” and for whatever reason, and will endure his or her petty ban from the club proceedings and return to the fold, later, untarnished. Perhaps with their reputation even enhanced for bucking the trend.
Freedom of the Press will remain undimmed because it, football and the Premier League demands the mutual oxygen of publicity. And no one can deny that.
Perhaps not even Fergie …







@Mike: Not sure if the fact that David Gill is on the board of the FA is relevant. The Chairman of the board of the FA, David Bernstein, used to be the chairman of Man City. Sir David Richard used to be the chairman of Sheffield Wednesday, but is now Vice-Chairman. Also on the board are people from Bolton, Boro and Barnet. It does not mean that Barnet are getting a lot of favours, I suspect…
“Bear in mind, we have to work with the managers week in, week out. To open a presser with the line “Why did you lie to us last week, Harry?” or “Please tell us the truth this time, Sir Alex” would not be the best option.”
Does honesty not count for anything in the relationship though? If they can openly lie and not get called out on it then you’re not working with them, you’re being used by them, and it means that nothing that you write about from the presser can be assumed to be true, which should be the starting point of any piece of journalism.
Is this what you had in mind when you first started as a journo? Being routinely lied to by managers and feeling that you don’t have the power to call them out on it?
I appreciate that you may want to but are under pressure fro superiors to get a story, and you’d not be able to do that if you were barred from the presser, but that in itself speaks of a media that isn’t interested in the truth, just in content, and that’s not what I have an interest in reading.
I reiterate my point. Should you have to meet a senior executive every week to discuss ongoing matters, would you really open each discussion by telling him that you know he lied to you the previous week? You wouldn’t last long in the job. There has to be a certain amount of mutual “good faith” between journos and managers but, sadly, that has become increasingly one way in the past decade. Many years ago, when I first started in the profession, managers were much more trustworthy. But if I go into every presser with the attitude that I do not believe anything the manager tells me, why am I going in there? I will have nothing to write because it’s obviously all lies. I might as well ban myself !! And if I do print the truth – because I have backed it up from elsewhere – I get banned, anyway … like my two colleague mentioned in the article. Not all managers are total control freaks, like Fergie, and large percentages of their pressers will contain accurate views and information from them. But now and again, a “porkie pie” will be told. Believe me, spotting them is not always easy.
incredible comment from mike! those sorts of facts make very interesting reading and that information should be more widely known.
Some referee facts:
1. Mike Dean, referee, when Blackburn beat Manchester United 3-2 and hasn’t refereed a Manchester United game since.
2. Mike Dean – referee, in 2010, after Manchester United’s defeat to Chelsea, was demoted to the Championship.
3. Alan Wiley, called “fat and unfit” by Alex after Manchester United’s draw with Sunderland,” agreed to retire” that season, he was also the ref on OT when the mancs lost 1-4 to Liverpool.
4. Mark Clattenburg refereed Manchester United’s 6-1 defeat to Manchester City, hasn’t refereed a single Manchester United game after that Manchester derby. (has acted as 4th official in 3)
5. Martin Atkinson -Involved in Manchester United’s defeat to Chelsea, criticized by Alex, ha…sn’t refereed Manchester United game since.
6. Ex referee Jeff Winter openly stating that he hadn’t been given a Manchester United game for 2 years after sending Roy Keane off.
7. Howard Webb has been Manchester United’s most used referee since the defeat to Manchester City.
8. More than 18% of the penalties Webb has awarded in his 8 year career have been to Manchester United.
9. Manchester United’s CEO is on the board of The FA.
10. Alex Ferguson not happy with Chris Foy after their 3-2 defeat to spurs, Foy demoted to a League Two game between Accrington Stanley and Rochdale this weekend. something he hasn’t done since the 2001-02 season.
Make of that what you want.
Wow, Mike … you’ve really done your homework !! … looks like not long before Man Utd fixture is cancelled due to lack of a referee approved by Sir Alex !!
And herein lies the problem with the British football media:
“Sometimes, you just didn’t know whether he was being serious or talking clap-trap. But who cared? It always made for a great yarn. And yet, when his first XI selection was unveiled on the Saturday afterwards, you did wonder: “Er, Harry. Were you not being rather convenient with the truth?””
Takes quotes, turn into story, forget about them when they became chip paper. If you lot were proper journalists you’d question managers if you thought they were telling half-truths, or confront them with it next press conference. Instead they’re not held in the slightest bit accountable and they can carry on spouting their drivel unchecked. It’s pretty pathetic all round.
Bear in mind, we have to work with the managers week in, week out. To open a presser with the line “Why did you lie to us last week, Harry?” or “Please tell us the truth this time, Sir Alex” would not be the best option.